On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:49:58AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:42:31PM -0800, Adrian.Hulse@taec.toshiba.com wrote:
> > int-handler.s:59: Error: missing ')'
> > int-handler.s:59: Error: illegal operands `lui'
> > int-handler.s:60: Error: missing ')'
> > int-handler.s:60: Error: illegal operands `sb'
> > make: *** [ int-handler.o ] Error 1
> > int-handler.S
> > <l59> lui t1, %hi(TSDB_LED_ADDR)
> > <l60> sb t0, %lo(TSDB_LDE_ADDR)(t1)
> > Failed define :
> > #define TSDB_LED_ADDR (KSEG1 + TSDB_LB_PCU_APERTURE + 0x05100020)
> > Compilable define :
> > #define TSDB_LED_ADDR KSEG1 + TSDB_LB_PCU_APERTURE + 0x05100020
> > Anyone else seen anything like this and know of a solution to the problem ?
> > Or to paraphrase Dominic Sweetman, maybe i should just stay with the "pick
> > your own version folklore" method of picking tools :).
I had a similar problem with binutils-126.96.36.199.12.3, but
Thiemo Seufer posted a patch on the binutils mailing list.
Should be fixed in binutils CVS.
It seems that it worked with the binutils-188.8.131.52.2 recommended
> I hope that for binutils we can solve that problem when 2.9.12 gets
> released; as for gcc it seems Maciej's 2.95.3 version is already pretty
> close to what we want. C++ users may disagree ;-) Somewhat longer term
> Algorithmics's toolchain should resolve the situation.