linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: gcc-2.96-99 optimization bug?

from [Atsushi Nemoto] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: hjl@lucon.org
Subject: Re: gcc-2.96-99 optimization bug?
From: Atsushi Nemoto <nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:03:33 +0900 (JST)
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20020208103047.A6079@lucon.org>
Organization: TOSHIBA Personal Computer System Corporation
References: <20020208.193731.48536791.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20020208103047.A6079@lucon.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com 
>>>>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:30:47 -0800, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> said:
hjl> gcc 3.1 seems fine. No one is working on gcc 2.96. I am working
hjl> on a new Linuxx/mips which will use gcc 3.1.

Thank you.  I will wait for your new package and try it.

---
Atsushi Nemoto
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: gcc include strangeness, Ralf Baechle
Next by Date:  RE: [patch] linux 2.4.17: The second mb() rework (final), Maciej W. Rozycki
Previous by Thread:  Re: gcc-2.96-99 optimization bug?, H . J . Lu
Next by Thread:  Re: gcc-2.96-99 optimization bug?, Zhang Fuxin
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]