Re: gcc-2.96-99 optimization bug?

["H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>]

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 07:37:31PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> I found gcc 2.96 (gcc-2.96-99.1.mipsel.rpm in H.J.Lu's RedHat 7.1)
> outputs wrong code for this short program.
> 
> It seems one 'bnez' in good code (at 4007c4) was lost in bad code.
> 
> Is this a know problem?  If so, is there any patches available?
> 

gcc 3.1 seems fine. No one is working on gcc 2.96. I am working on
a new Linuxx/mips which will use gcc 3.1.


H.J.