linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: gcc 3.x, -ansi and "static inline"

To: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.x, -ansi and "static inline"
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 00:01:09 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <3C5F11AB.957DDA6C@mvista.com>; from jsun@mvista.com on Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:56:43PM -0800
References: <20020201115206.A18085@mvista.com> <20020203180151.A5371@dea.linux-mips.net> <3C5EE0D0.F2CC94CE@mvista.com> <20020204232108.A7266@dea.linux-mips.net> <3C5F11AB.957DDA6C@mvista.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:56:43PM -0800, Jun Sun wrote:

> In theory, yes.  In practice, kernel head is all a big mesh where we don't
> have a clear division as which part can go to userland and which part can't.

The answer is already l-k faq probably - copy the kernel header to
userspace and hack it into your favorite shape.  I'm not a fan of this
policy but ...

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>