| To: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: gcc 3.x, -ansi and "static inline" |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Feb 2002 00:01:09 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <3C5F11AB.957DDA6C@mvista.com>; from jsun@mvista.com on Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:56:43PM -0800 |
| References: | <20020201115206.A18085@mvista.com> <20020203180151.A5371@dea.linux-mips.net> <3C5EE0D0.F2CC94CE@mvista.com> <20020204232108.A7266@dea.linux-mips.net> <3C5F11AB.957DDA6C@mvista.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:56:43PM -0800, Jun Sun wrote: > In theory, yes. In practice, kernel head is all a big mesh where we don't > have a clear division as which part can go to userland and which part can't. The answer is already l-k faq probably - copy the kernel header to userspace and hack it into your favorite shape. I'm not a fan of this policy but ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: gcc 3.x, -ansi and "static inline", Jun Sun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3), H . J . Lu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: gcc 3.x, -ansi and "static inline", Jun Sun |
| Next by Thread: | RE: fsck fails on latest 2.4 kernel, Matthew Dharm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |