| To: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Re: SNaN & QNaN on mips |
| From: | Zhang Fuxin <fxzhang@ict.ac.cn> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:50:43 +0800 |
| Cc: | "linux-mips@oss.sgi.com" <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
在 2002-02-03 22:54:00 you wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:22:48PM +0800, Zhang Fuxin wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> Gcc (2.96 20000731,H.J.LU's rh port for mips) think 0x7fc00000 is QNaN and
>> optimize 0.0/0.0 as 0x7fc00000 for single precision ops,while for my cpu
>> (maybe most mips cpu) is a SNaN. R4k user's manual and "See Mips Run" both
>> say so.And experiments confirm this.
>>
>> Should we correct it?
>
>Yes. Do you have a patch?
Not currently but I will have a try. glibc seems having the same problem.
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>H.J.
Regards
Zhang Fuxin
fxzhang@ict.ac.cn
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SNaN & QNaN on mips, Kjeld Borch Egevang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3), Dominic Sweetman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SNaN & QNaN on mips, Kjeld Borch Egevang |
| Next by Thread: | endless recursive loop in pow(), Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |