[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [libc-alpha] Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips

To: Hiroyuki Machida <>
Subject: Re: [libc-alpha] Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips
From: Kaz Kylheku <>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Cc: <>, <>, <>, <>
In-reply-to: <>
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Hiroyuki Machida wrote:
> Please note that "sc" may fail even if nobody write the
> variable. (See P.211 "8.4.2 Load-Linked/Sotre-Conditional" of "See 
> MIPS RUN" for more detail.) 
> So, after your patch applied, compare_and_swap() may fail, even if
> *p is equal to oldval.

I can't think of anything that will break because of this, as long
as the compare_and_swap eventually succeeds on some subsequent trial.
If the atomic operation has to abort for some reason other than *p being
unequal to oldval, that should be cool.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>