| To: | Matthew Dharm <mdharm@momenco.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Does Linux invalidate TLB entries? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:02:51 +0100 |
| Cc: | Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <NEBBLJGMNKKEEMNLHGAIGECBCFAA.mdharm@momenco.com>; from mdharm@momenco.com on Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 05:03:42PM -0800 |
| References: | <NEBBLJGMNKKEEMNLHGAIGECBCFAA.mdharm@momenco.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 05:03:42PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > I'm still trying to track down the cause of all my problems, so I'm > going over the RM7000 errata. > > I see one here that I'm not sure if it's a problem or not. It only > applies to OSes which invalidate TLB entries and thus will cause TLB > Invalid exceptions (as opposed to a TLB refill exception, I think). > > So, does Linux invalidate TLBs? I've been looking at the code, and I > think the answer is 'no', but I'm not really sure. Yes, Linux may create TLB entries with V=0. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ADMIN: HTML postings, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Unused R5432 cache routines..., Steven J. Hill |
| Previous by Thread: | Does Linux invalidate TLB entries?, Matthew Dharm |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Does Linux invalidate TLB entries?, Matthew Dharm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |