[Top] [All Lists]

Re: thread-ready ABIs

To: "Dominic Sweetman" <>, "H . J . Lu" <>
Subject: Re: thread-ready ABIs
From: "Kevin D. Kissell" <>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:21:21 +0100
Cc: "Ulrich Drepper" <>, "GNU libc hacker" <>, <>
References: <m3elkoa5dw.fsf@myware.mynet><><01b801c1a081$3f6518e0$0deca8c0@Ulysses><> <>
> > > It would, in principle, be possible to save/restore k0
> > > or k1 (but not both) if no other clever solution can be found.  
> > > There are other VM OSes that manage to do so for MIPS, 
> > > for other outside-the-old-ABI reasons.  It does, of course,
> > > add some instructions and some memory traffic to the 
> > > low-level exception handling , and we would have to look 
> > > at whether we would want to make such a feature standard 
> > > or specific to a "thread-ready" kernel build.
> > 
> > I like the read-only k0 idea. We just need to make a system call to
> > tell kernel what value to put in k0 before returning to the user space.
> > It shouldn't be too hard to implement. I will try it next week.
> You could, I guess, wire a TLB entry to map the thread register into
> the highest virtual memory region of the machine (the top of 'kseg2'),
> which is accessible in a single instruction as a negative offset from
> $0.

Funny you should mention this.  I was thinking about it
yesterday in this context as something else that I've seen 
done in some non-Linux MIPS OSes, and something that 
I think would be a better solution for CPU-specific fast 
storage in SMP configurations than some of the hacks that
I've seen proposed for SMP MIPS/Linux so far.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>