| To: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MIPS64 status? |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:11:22 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <15426.48692.795968.819750@gladsmuir.algor.co.uk> |
| References: | <20020113211323.A7115@momenco.com> <15426.48692.795968.819750@gladsmuir.algor.co.uk> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.25i |
Dominic Sweetman wrote: [snip] > > I suspect that this is very much a toolchain issue, as I don't think > > gcc will generate 64-bit addressing code. gcc does 64bit adressing, but binutils (ld/gas) do only partially yet. > I suspect that the generic GNU toolchains are pretty buggy when you > switch on 64-bit MIPS operation; but it's bug-fixes which are needed, > not wholesale new features. It needs definitely more than bug fixing. I commited some support for n64 non-PIC to binutils CVS some time ago, but support for n64 PIC and n32 still needs to be done. Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Perl on R4k6 (_not_ the segfault problem), Jan-Benedict Glaw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: -ELOOP: Problem during package installation, Jan-Benedict Glaw |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MIPS64 status?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS64 status?, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |