| To: | Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MIPS64 status? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:07:51 -0800 |
| Cc: | Matthew Dharm <mdharm@momenco.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020114132552.25800G-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>; from jgg@debian.org on Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:42:22PM -0700 |
| References: | <NEBBLJGMNKKEEMNLHGAIEEMNCEAA.mdharm@momenco.com> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020114132552.25800G-100000@wakko.deltatee.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:42:22PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I have such hardware myself. IMHO the best option is the mips64 kernel and > I hope to try it someday. But in practice I'd guess that Ralf's highmem > patch is more likely to be usuable first (?). Depends if you can live with the problems of the current mips64 kernel. If you can then it's highmem-free memory managment is certainly the way to go. It's also not limited to peanuts numbers of gigabytes but can support as much memory as your can tack on a MIPS. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: MIPS64 status?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MIPS64 status?, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: MIPS64 status?, Jason Gunthorpe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS64 status?, Jason Gunthorpe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |