linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Signals

from [Ralf Baechle] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
Subject: Re: Signals
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:53:34 -0200
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <3C2B0093.3AFC80A9@mips.com>; from carstenl@mips.com on Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:05:55PM +0100
References: <3C2B0093.3AFC80A9@mips.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i 
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:05:55PM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote:

> Why is the signals definition (in include/asm-mips/signal.h) for MIPS
> different from everybody else ?
> For example:
> 
> Hdefine SIGBUS      10    (MIPS)
> Hdefine SIGBUS        7    (I386)
> 
> Hdefine SIGSTKFLT       16   (I386, doesn't exist on MIPS)
> 
> Is there any reason for this ?

Time to read the ABI :-)

  Ralf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Signals, Carsten Langgaard
    • Re: Signals, Ralf Baechle <=
Previous by Date:  Flash File System on MIPS 79S334A Board, Rajesh B. V.
Next by Date:  Re: weekly O2 patches ;), Ralf Baechle
Previous by Thread:  Signals, Carsten Langgaard
Next by Thread:  [patch] fix compares of jiffies, Tim Schmielau
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]