| To: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Signals |
| From: | Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:05:55 +0100 |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
Why is the signals definition (in include/asm-mips/signal.h) for MIPS
different from everybody else ?
For example:
#define SIGBUS 10 (MIPS)
#define SIGBUS 7 (I386)
#define SIGSTKFLT 16 (I386, doesn't exist on MIPS)
Is there any reason for this ?
/Carsten
--
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556
Denmark http://www.mips.com
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: an old FPU context corruption problem when signal happens, Carsten Langgaard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: vmalloc bugs in 2.4.5???, Tommy S. Christensen |
| Previous by Thread: | config.guess changs, Ryan Murray |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Signals, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |