Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:58:51AM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote:
> > Are you sure this hasn't been fix in the latest sources (2.4.16) ?
> > I have send a patch to Ralf, which I believe solves a similar problem as
> > you describe below.
> > Ralf have you applied the patch ?
> Well, I applied it but it's really broken as something can be. Just an
> + /*
> + * FPU emulator may have it's own trampoline active just
> + * above the user stack, 16-bytes before the next lowest
> + * 16 byte boundary. Try to avoid trashing it.
> + */
> + sp -= 32;
> So the whole thing needs some overhaul.
You are welcome to find a better way of handling a non-fpu instruction in the
delay slot of the fpu-branch instruction.
But until someone find a better solution (that works, in all situation), I
think we need this patch.
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:email@example.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556