linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: .section problems in entry.S

To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: .section problems in entry.S
From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 23:13:59 +0100
In-reply-to: <20011213162752.A6983@nevyn.them.org>
References: <20011209221835.A11737@dea.linux-mips.net> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011210165719.24010A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> <20011213184541.A7171@dea.linux-mips.net> <20011213221254.G487@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20011213162752.A6983@nevyn.them.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:12:54PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > >  There are no working released binutils for a modern MIPS/Linux system,
> > > > AFAIK.  However, version 2.11.92 from the CVS seems to work reasonably
> > > > well now, so chances are the next release will do as well.  Maybe 2.12
> > > > will be a good candidate then, once it is released and tested a bit. 
> > > 
> > > What is the schedule for 2.12?
> > 
> > AFAIK it is to be done in parallel to the GCC schedule:
> >   2001-12-15  Functionality freeze.
> >   2002-02-15  Branch for gcc 3.1 and binutils 2.12.
> >   2002-04-15  Release.
> 
> Where did you get this information from?

The schedule for GCC can be found at http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html .
For the last binutils release there was some connection to the GCC
schedule. I _assume_ the next release will be done in a similiar way
due to the dependencies between both projects.


Thiemo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>