On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:45:42PM -0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:03:41PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > > Certainly not. The problem is known and so far I've just hacked around
> > > it more or less elegant. But it's a trap and so I think we've got good
> > > reasons to force people to upgrade to a newer assembler than the current
> > > minimal version. The question is which - I don't like frequent tool
> > > upgrades.
> > There are no working released binutils for a modern MIPS/Linux system,
> > AFAIK. However, version 2.11.92 from the CVS seems to work reasonably
> > well now, so chances are the next release will do as well. Maybe 2.12
> > will be a good candidate then, once it is released and tested a bit.
> What is the schedule for 2.12?
There isn't one yet; I'm hoping within three months. I'm going to try
to roll the ball a little this week.
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer