| To: | Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?) |
| From: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:20:28 -0800 |
| Cc: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112110933570.17417-100000@hypatia.brisbane.redhat.com>; from bje@redhat.com on Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 09:34:52AM +1000 |
| References: | <20011210092104.A29953@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112110933570.17417-100000@hypatia.brisbane.redhat.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 09:34:52AM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote: > > > Of course, this needs some refinement. ;-) Perhaps we need to run > > > through $(CC_FOR_BUILD) -E or somesuch; cpp is no good, as it won't > > > know all of the magic '*MIPS*' #defines. > > > HJ's patch didn't compile anything; it ran code through > > $(CC_FOR_BUILD) -E :) > > I must admit, I missed that. But I definitely noticed that it created > temporary files, which are more trouble than they're worth. The number of > people running ./configure as root is frightening. I don't want to assume $(CC_FOR_BUILD) can take - as input. H.J. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), Ben Elliston |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), Ben Elliston |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), Ben Elliston |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |