| To: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?) |
| From: | Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:34:52 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>, <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <20011210092104.A29953@nevyn.them.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
> > Of course, this needs some refinement. ;-) Perhaps we need to run > > through $(CC_FOR_BUILD) -E or somesuch; cpp is no good, as it won't > > know all of the magic '*MIPS*' #defines. > HJ's patch didn't compile anything; it ran code through > $(CC_FOR_BUILD) -E :) I must admit, I missed that. But I definitely noticed that it created temporary files, which are more trouble than they're worth. The number of people running ./configure as root is frightening. Ben |
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), Ben Elliston |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), H . J . Lu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |