| To: | Ian Chilton <ian@ichilton.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150) |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Dec 2001 00:31:43 -0200 |
| Cc: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20011203224401.A31747@woody.ichilton.co.uk>; from ian@ichilton.co.uk on Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:44:01PM +0000 |
| References: | <20011203161921.B30391@woody.ichilton.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0112031726021.2278-100000@hlubocky.del.cz> <20011203192543.A10394@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20011203224401.A31747@woody.ichilton.co.uk> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:44:01PM +0000, Ian Chilton wrote: > > Immediatly afterwards the massive ammount of IRQs. With 100Hz and 160 > > Chars across the screen - I would expect 1-2 lines/s on the screen. > > Instead the screen fills up within tens of seconds which seems to me > > like non acked IRQ. > > Weird.. > > Has any changes been made to the IRQ code lately? There indeed were and the guilty person already sent me a few fixes which I haven't applied yet. Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: spurious_count cleanup, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux on Indy, kernel compile (2.4.14) and xfree ..., carsten busse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150), Ian Chilton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150), Ladislav Michl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |