| To: | linux-mips-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, ralf@oss.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pci_auto handles better when no IO/MEM behind P2P bridge |
| From: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 06 Dec 2001 18:27:31 -0800 |
| References: | <3C1024A2.F3603F6A@mvista.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
Perhaps this one is better. It wastes a little PCI space, but looks more elegant... Is elegance still worth anything? :-) Jun diff -Nru linux-2.4.16/arch/mips/kernel/pci_auto.c.orig
linux-2.4.16/arch/mips/kernel/pci_auto.c
--- linux-2.4.16/arch/mips/kernel/pci_auto.c.orig Mon Nov 26 18:22:58 2001
+++ linux-2.4.16/arch/mips/kernel/pci_auto.c Thu Dec 6 18:24:00 2001
@@ -256,6 +256,14 @@
{
u32 temp;
+ /*
+ * [jsun] we always bump up baselines a little, so that if there
+ * nothing behind P2P bridge, we don't wind up overlapping IO/MEM
+ * spaces.
+ */
+ pciauto_lower_memspc += 1;
+ pciauto_lower_iospc += 1;
+
/* Configure bus number registers */
early_write_config_byte(hose, top_bus, current_bus, pci_devfn,
PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS, sub_bus);
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] pci_auto handles better when no IO/MEM behind P2P bridge, Jun Sun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | v2.4 vs v2.5 in CVS, Phil Thompson |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] pci_auto handles better when no IO/MEM behind P2P bridge, Jun Sun |
| Next by Thread: | v2.4 vs v2.5 in CVS, Phil Thompson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |