linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cp

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?)
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:16:17 -0200
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, config-patches@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <20011206105142.A7995@lucon.org>; from hjl@lucon.org on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:51:42AM -0800
References: <20011206093506.A6496@lucon.org> <20011206155724.A11083@dea.linux-mips.net> <20011206103605.A7366@lucon.org> <20011206164153.E8002@dea.linux-mips.net> <20011206105142.A7995@lucon.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:51:42AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:

> > > How about this patch?
> > 
> > Looks good to me except that checking for __MIPSE[LB]__ should be
> > sufficient.  Anything that doesn't provide these two symbols wouldn't
> > have the chance of a snowball in hell to work.
> > 
> 
> I added those just in case someone wants to use a different compiler
> to bootstrap gcc on Linux/mips :-). I don't think it will hurt anyhing.

Sure, it won't.  And those guys who don't use a Linux/MIPS compiler seem
to be decieded to have _alot_ of extra fun anyway :-)

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>