| To: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?) |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:16:17 -0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, config-patches@gnu.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20011206105142.A7995@lucon.org>; from hjl@lucon.org on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:51:42AM -0800 |
| References: | <20011206093506.A6496@lucon.org> <20011206155724.A11083@dea.linux-mips.net> <20011206103605.A7366@lucon.org> <20011206164153.E8002@dea.linux-mips.net> <20011206105142.A7995@lucon.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:51:42AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote: > > > How about this patch? > > > > Looks good to me except that checking for __MIPSE[LB]__ should be > > sufficient. Anything that doesn't provide these two symbols wouldn't > > have the chance of a snowball in hell to work. > > > > I added those just in case someone wants to use a different compiler > to bootstrap gcc on Linux/mips :-). I don't think it will hurt anyhing. Sure, it won't. And those guys who don't use a Linux/MIPS compiler seem to be decieded to have _alot_ of extra fun anyway :-) Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), H . J . Lu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ²À °ËÅäÇÏ¿© Áֽʽÿä, news |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), H . J . Lu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?), Ben Elliston |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |