| To: | ldavies@agile.tv |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] mips_atomic_set fixups (with LLSC) |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:17:59 -0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <3C0F059A.30709@agile.tv>; from ldavies@agile.tv on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:43:54PM +1000 |
| References: | <3C0F059A.30709@agile.tv> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:43:54PM +1000, Liam Davies wrote: > The kernel can be caused to crash when making the following syscall > sysmips(MIPS_ATOMIC_SET, [unaligned addr], value, 0); > > The latest mips_atomic_set does not use the fixups that are defined > for the ll/sc instructions. > > If an unaligned address is passed in we take the exception and > unaligned.c:emulate_load_store_insn ignores the fixups for the > ll/sc and sends a SIGBUS instead, thus causing the kernel to die. An unaligned ll/sc instruction in the kernel is a bug in itself as such it's not unaligned.c that is to blame. As such I'm going to checkin a patch that is close but not identical to your patch. Blame me for this bug, I *knew* and forgot about it ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Booting from IDE, Nitin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?, H . J . Lu |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] mips_atomic_set fixups (with LLSC), Liam Davies |
| Next by Thread: | Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?, H . J . Lu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |