| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150 |
| From: | Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:04:44 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011204123941.5469C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| References: | <200112040926.KAA13860@sparta.research.kpn.com> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011204123941.5469C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.23i |
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Houten K.H.C. van (Karel) wrote:
>
> > > the current cvs (as of a couple hours ago) works without additional
> > > patches on my Decstation 5000/150 like a charm:
> >
> > I got the current CVS 2.5.0 kernel running on my 5000/260 too. Without any
> > patches. I hope to be able to compile a new root image, and update my
> > website in the next weeks.
>
> Not surprising as the only difference between 2.4.16 and 2.5.0 is the
> version number. ;-)
Err, that was 2.4.15 and 2.5.0, 2.4.16 contains at least the
filesystem-uncorruption
feature, no?
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user friendly ... It's just picky about its friends.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |