linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Subject: Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150
From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:04:44 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011204123941.5469C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
References: <200112040926.KAA13860@sparta.research.kpn.com> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011204123941.5469C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Houten K.H.C. van (Karel) wrote:
> 
> > > the current cvs (as of a couple hours ago) works without additional
> > > patches on my Decstation 5000/150 like a charm:
> > 
> > I got the current CVS 2.5.0 kernel running on my 5000/260 too. Without any
> > patches. I hope to be able to compile a new root image, and update my
> > website in the next weeks.
> 
>  Not surprising as the only difference between 2.4.16 and 2.5.0 is the
> version number. ;-) 

Err, that was 2.4.15 and 2.5.0, 2.4.16 contains at least the 
filesystem-uncorruption
feature, no?

Regards,

        Joey

-- 
Unix is user friendly ...  It's just picky about its friends.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>