>>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:25:30 +1100, Ralf Baechle <email@example.com> said:
ralf> It get's atomicity wrong. I suggest to make such statistics a
ralf> per thread thing. That'll not only solve the SMP issues but
ralf> also make sure processes running in parallel won't influence the
Thank you for the comment.
Yes, my patch provides "CPU" statistics (not "thread" statistics).
Counting per thread might be useful in some case, but counting
globally (like "unaligned_instructions" or "ll_ops" counter) is enough