| To: | ralf@oss.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FP exception statistics |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:29:06 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20011121192530.A13414@dea.linux-mips.net> |
| Organization: | TOSHIBA Personal Computer System Corporation |
| References: | <20011121.160347.48536367.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20011121192530.A13414@dea.linux-mips.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
>>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:25:30 +1100, Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> said: ralf> It get's atomicity wrong. I suggest to make such statistics a ralf> per thread thing. That'll not only solve the SMP issues but ralf> also make sure processes running in parallel won't influence the ralf> result. Thank you for the comment. Yes, my patch provides "CPU" statistics (not "thread" statistics). Counting per thread might be useful in some case, but counting globally (like "unaligned_instructions" or "ll_ops" counter) is enough for me. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FP exception statistics, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FP exception statistics, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FP exception statistics, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FP exception statistics, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |