| To: | kjlin <kj.lin@viditec-netmedia.com.tw> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: fork() vs vfork() |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:29:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <05e901c141a0$a03e6120$056aaac0@kjlin>; from kj.lin@viditec-netmedia.com.tw on Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:51:08PM +0800 |
| References: | <05e901c141a0$a03e6120$056aaac0@kjlin> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:51:08PM +0800, kjlin wrote:
> From: "kjlin" <kj.lin@viditec-netmedia.com.tw>
> To: <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
> Subject: fork() vs vfork()
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:51:08 +0800
>
> Hi all,
>
> How does linux-mips treat the vfork() function?
> I can see the fork() implemented in syscall.c as following:
>
> save_static_function(sys_fork);
> static_unused int _sys_fork(struct pt_regs regs)
> {
> int res;
> res = do_fork(SIGCHLD, regs.regs[29], ®s, 0);
> return res;
> }
> Why not do the same "sys_vfork" in linux-mips?
> Does it mean that MIPS does not support vfork() or vfork() is equal to fork()
> in MIPS platform?
Hint: save_static_function is a macro.
Ralf
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: native gcc-3.0.1?, william |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Continued MIPS kernel debugging symbols problem..., Amit S. Kale |
| Previous by Thread: | fork() vs vfork(), kjlin |
| Next by Thread: | busybox does not like 2.4.8, or the other way around?, Jun Sun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |