| To: | "Siders, Keith" <keith_siders@toshibatv.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How to access kernel memory? |
| From: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:41:29 -0400 |
| Cc: | "'Zhang Fuxin'" <fxzhang@ict.ac.cn>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <7DF7BFDC95ECD411B4010090278A44CA1B72E5@ATVX>; from keith_siders@toshibatv.com on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:59:07AM -0500 |
| References: | <7DF7BFDC95ECD411B4010090278A44CA1B72E5@ATVX> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.16i |
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:59:07AM -0500, Siders, Keith wrote: > I have just the opposite requirement. I need to allow any running process > and its threads to be "hot-patched" with executable code. I know you're > thinking "why?". I can't tell you that. I can only say it's a firm > requirement, and I could use some helpful ideas. You can probably do all you need in this case with ptrace() - the existing ptrace will not be quite adequate for large data sets, especially if you need some atomicity, but it should have all the sample kernel code you need. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Freeing global memory used only by __init functions, Gerald Champagne |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Freeing global memory used only by __init functions, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: How to access kernel memory?, Siders, Keith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: How to access kernel memory?, Zhang Fuxin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |