| To: | Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit |
| From: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:53:25 -0700 |
| Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>, Ryan Murray <rmurray@cyberhqz.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20010917154001.D30386@redhat.com>; from rth@redhat.com on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:40:01PM -0700 |
| References: | <20010916091654.C1812@lucon.org> <Pine.BSO.4.33.0109161323280.14503-100000@oddbox.cn> <20010917000719.B25531@false.linpro.no> <20010916153857.H22750@cyberhqz.com> <20010916155003.B1446@lucon.org> <20010917035509.B24278@dea.linux-mips.net> <20010917154001.D30386@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:40:01PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:55:09AM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > It is. Yet I wouldn't like to assign a different meaning to -fpic and > > -fPIC as most makefiles make little difference between these two options, > > so that would imply quite some overhead. > > There is already such a difference. Sparc uses 13-bit GOT offsets > with -fpic and 32-bit offsets with -fPIC. I'm considering changes > to Alpha to use a 16/32 split for pic/PIC. Can you mix object files compiled with -fPIC/-fpic on Sparc/Alpha? H.J. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit, Jakub Jelinek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit, Richard Henderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit, Richard Henderson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit, Richard Henderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |