linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Subject: Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 03:55:09 +0200
Cc: Ryan Murray <rmurray@cyberhqz.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
In-reply-to: <20010916155003.B1446@lucon.org>; from hjl@lucon.org on Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:50:03PM -0700
References: <20010916091654.C1812@lucon.org> <Pine.BSO.4.33.0109161323280.14503-100000@oddbox.cn> <20010917000719.B25531@false.linpro.no> <20010916153857.H22750@cyberhqz.com> <20010916155003.B1446@lucon.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:50:03PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:

> I don't think mips is the only platform which has this problem. Do
> Alpha, PowerPC and Sparc have similar problems like that? What are
> the solutions for them?
> 
> BTW, it sounds like the -fpic vs. -fPIC issue. 

It is.  Yet I wouldn't like to assign a different meaning to -fpic and
-fPIC as most makefiles make little difference between these two options,
so that would imply quite some overhead.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>