| To: | Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: setup_frame() failure |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:19:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | Atsushi Nemoto <nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <3B9C6B81.94FB616@mips.com>; from carstenl@mips.com on Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:28:02AM +0200 |
| References: | <20010907.202652.71083122.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20010908013638.A19154@dea.linux-mips.net> <3B9C6B81.94FB616@mips.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:28:02AM +0200, Carsten Langgaard wrote:
> I like the printout then getting a Reserved Instruction Exception, it
> indicates a problem and things are much easier to debug when getting
> such messages. So it would be a pity, if we need to get rid of that.
A denial of service can be constructed from such printout, so this can't
stay in an release version. Think of what
#include <signal.h>
static void si(void) { }
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
signal(SIGILL, sh);
while(1)
asm volatile("mfc0 $0, $0");
}
would do if each exception would result in a line in syslog.
Ralf
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: setup_frame() failure, Carsten Langgaard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kernel test & benchmark tools?, Jun Sun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: setup_frame() failure, Carsten Langgaard |
| Next by Thread: | Update for RedHat 7.1, H . J . Lu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |