| To: | Steven Liu <stevenliu@psdc.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Load address of the application is not right. |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Sep 2001 02:32:10 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <84CE342693F11946B9F54B18C1AB837B0A28BC@ex2k.pcs.psdc.com>; from stevenliu@psdc.com on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:34:08PM -0700 |
| References: | <84CE342693F11946B9F54B18C1AB837B0A28BC@ex2k.pcs.psdc.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:34:08PM -0700, Steven Liu wrote: > My question is who assign value to register t9 (i.e. $25) and where? Why > $gp was given 0xfc2 and then added by -32624 ? Because $gp and $t9 gave a > wrong address 0fc100a8, the CPU give a page fault and the OS said that the > address is not GROWDOWN and faild to continue. > > I think it related to my glibc but I do not know the exact place. > > If you had this kind problem before, please share your knowlage with me. Looks very much like at least one of dynamic linker or binutils is buggy. You may also have cache coherency issues. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Signal 11 on Process Termination - Update, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Signal 11 on Process Termination - Update, Pete Popov |
| Previous by Thread: | Load address of the application is not right., Steven Liu |
| Next by Thread: | ramdisk support failing, Manoj Ekbote |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |