linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: segfault

To: Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>
Subject: Re: segfault
From: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 19:15:50 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20010904235410.A8310@neurosis.mit.edu>
Organization: rfc822 - pure communication
References: <20010904235410.A8310@neurosis.mit.edu>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 11:54:10PM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
> 
> do_page_fault( )#2: sending SIGSEGV to test-prog for illegal write
> access to 00000fd4 (epc == 004027b8, ra == 00402730)
> 
> The strange part about this (and the reason why I suspect someone may
> be able to help me) is that the address 00000fd4 is always the same,
> implying that the binaries are all failing in the same way.  Has
> anyone seen this or does anyone have any ideas why this may be
> happening?

Do you have a fix for the sysmips(MIPS_ATOMIC_SET) in there ? Or do
you have the glibc compiled as -mips2 for usage of ll/sc ?

This bug might be a register corruption due to wrong return path
in the sysmips case.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                  flo@rfc822.org             +49-5201-669912
     Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>