| To: | Phil.Thompson@pace.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Signal 11 on Process Termination - Update |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> |
| Date: | Wed, 05 Sep 2001 09:30:05 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <54045BFDAD47D5118A850002A5095CC30AC576@exchange1.cam.pace.co.uk> |
| Organization: | TOSHIBA Personal Computer System Corporation |
| References: | <54045BFDAD47D5118A850002A5095CC30AC576@exchange1.cam.pace.co.uk> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
>>>>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:48:33 +0100 , Phil Thompson >>>>> <Phil.Thompson@pace.co.uk> said: Phil> The SIGSEGV is being raised because the access_ok() in Phil> setup_frame() in kernel/signal.c is failing when trying to Phil> deliver another signal (SIGALRM or SIGCHLD in my cases). At setup_frame(), sp (regs->regs[29]) is in the kernel kernel stack, isn't it? If so, please try a patch for entry.S I posted a couple days ago. > Subject: Re: segfaults with 2.4.8 Hope this helps. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Signal 11 on Process Termination - Update, Phil Thompson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Load address of the application is not right., Steven Liu |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Signal 11 on Process Termination - Update, Phil Thompson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Signal 11 on Process Termination - Update, Phil Thompson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |