linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Changing WCHAR_TYPE from "long int" to "int"?

To: Gabriel Dos_Reis <gdosreis@sophia.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Changing WCHAR_TYPE from "long int" to "int"?
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:25:57 +0200
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>, Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com>
In-reply-to: <15214.52694.346958.536105@perceval.inria.fr>; from gdosreis@sophia.inria.fr on Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 07:04:36PM +0200
References: <20010805094806.A3146@lucon.org> <20010806115913.B17179@bacchus.dhis.org> <hoofptjy6k.fsf@gee.suse.de> <20010806182050.A21142@bacchus.dhis.org> <15214.52694.346958.536105@perceval.inria.fr>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 07:04:36PM +0200, Gabriel Dos_Reis wrote:

> | > I'm confused.  The ABI defines it to be long - and he should change it
> | > nevertheless?
> | 
> | It's defined as a "long", not "long int" so we're obviously off by a tiny
> | bit.
> 
> As far as far C++ is concerned, there is no pedantic difference
> between "long" and "long int" and "signed long int".

Guess why I said a tiny bit :-)

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>