| To: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] fix profiling in glibc for Linux/MIPS |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jul 2001 05:18:24 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20010727024820.B27008@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>; from ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de on Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:48:20AM +0200 |
| References: | <20010726103922.A6643@nevyn.them.org> <20010727024820.B27008@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:48:20AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 02:48:20 +0200 > To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com > Subject: Re: [patch] fix profiling in glibc for Linux/MIPS > From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > _mcount was doing awful things to its caller's stack frame. > > Maybe I'm missing something, but both the old and the new code > add 8 byte more to sp than they subtracted before. How is this > supposed to work? _mcount has some odd special calling convention. I don't recall any official standard that defines _mcount's calling convention but gcc uses it the same way as the proprietary compiler I tried. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4.6, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4.6, ´¿¬L©ú |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] fix profiling in glibc for Linux/MIPS, Thiemo Seufer |
| Next by Thread: | Linux 2.4.6, Siders, Keith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |