| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: GCC and Modules |
| From: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2001 09:30:56 -0700 |
| Cc: | Andre.Messerschmidt@infineon.com, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20010724182057.D27225@bacchus.dhis.org>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:20:57PM +0200 |
| References: | <86048F07C015D311864100902760F1DDFF000E@dlfw003a.dus.infineon.com> <20010724084005.A20319@lucon.org> <20010724182057.D27225@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:20:57PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:40:05AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > > > > As I understand the current stable release of binutils and gcc is not able > > > to compile functional modules. > > > > What are you talking about? My mips toolchain is as stable/good as the > > x86 version for RedHat 7.1. > > He's refering to the last official release of binutils which indeed wasn't > usable for modutils. What official release of binutils? Are we talking about the FSF official release? Since when did Linux use those? They won't even work right on Linux/x86. You should either use the Linux binutils or try your luck with CVS. H.J. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ATI Victoria on Malta, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ATI Victoria on Malta, Andrew Thornton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: GCC and Modules, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: GCC and Modules, H . J . Lu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |