linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question about ioctls.h

To: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
Subject: Re: Question about ioctls.h
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:23:38 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20010724100418.W31470@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>; from joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:04:18AM +0200
References: <20010724010342.R31470@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> <20010724012757.A4953@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010724015611.A10007@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010724100418.W31470@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:04:18AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:

> > > > Could somebody try to explain this to me?  I'm especially interested
> > > > in the #if part.  Why isn't tIOC defined normally?  It is used later.
> > > > in the file - and it is used externally by rp-pppoe for example.
> > > 
> > > Overly paranoid attempt at keeping the namespace cleaner than Mr Proper
> > > himself.
> > 
> > Try the patch below.
> 
> Thanks, looks good and works well.  Somebody should commit it.

I immediately commited it for both 2.2 and 2.4, mips and mips64.  You can
follow the commits on the linux-cvs@oss.sgi.com mailing lists.  Just
subscribe via Majordomo.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>