| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ll/sc emulation patch |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jul 2001 12:53:12 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010713124802.3193B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 12:52:55PM +0200 |
| References: | <20010712224520.C23062@bacchus.dhis.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010713124802.3193B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 12:52:55PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > There is a bunch of patches for ll/sc and MIPS_ATOMIC_SET floating around. > > I came to the conclusion that I don't like any of them so I'm just working > > on fixing the thing once and for all. > > What about the _test_and_set syscall? Having it implemented we could get > rid of the MIPS_ATOMIC_SET hack for post-2.4. Glibc may be made ready for > the transition any time now. I'm just making an attempt to re-implement the ll/sc emulation as light as possible. I hope to get the overhead down to the point were we don't need _test_and_set anymore - in any case below the overhead of a syscall. Have you ever profiled the number of calls to MIPS_ATOMIC_SET or _test_and_set? They'll be the other factor in a decission. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Gdb quit problem on Linux/mips, Daniel Jacobowitz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch to ptrace.c, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ll/sc emulation patch, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ll/sc emulation patch, Harald Koerfgen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |