| To: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Problems with mips2 compiled libc and linux 2.4.3 |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Jun 2001 21:41:17 +0200 |
| Cc: | Brian Murphy <brian@murphy.dk>, "linux-mips@oss.sgi.com" <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010618112253.A28744@lucon.org>; from hjl@lucon.org on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:22:53AM -0700 |
| References: | <3B2E4458.1637A08A@murphy.dk> <20010618112253.A28744@lucon.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:22:53AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > > which fails if any of the high 4 bits in the flags are set. According to > > the > > specs these are set for the various mipsx (x != 1) flavors - this seems > > > to mean > > that we do no allow anything higher than mips1 run on linux - can this > > be > > true? If so, why? > > There is no very good reason. I think we should add a MIPS ISA level > field in the mips cpuinfo so that we can check what ISA the hardware > support at the run-time. Yes and no. It would be nice but the available flags are not an suitable representation of processor capabilities. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Profiling support in glibc?, Brian Murphy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Profiling support in glibc?, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problems with mips2 compiled libc and linux 2.4.3, H . J . Lu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problems with mips2 compiled libc and linux 2.4.3, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |