linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New toolchain for Linux/mips

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Subject: Re: New toolchain for Linux/mips
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:17:41 -0700
Cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010607123246.4624B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:37:27PM +0200
References: <20010606132402.A27901@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010607123246.4624B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:37:27PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > >  Make sure your kernel is flushing the icache right. 
> > 
> > Hmm, thanks, I'll check.  I don't think that's it, though.
> 
>  This happened to me once.  Otherwise, it looks like gdb doesn't recognize
> a breakpoint for some reason -- possibly it places it at a wrong address. 
> It shouldn't be difficult to debug -- you get information of the address
> the trap happened. 

Wouldn't you hope?  No such luck.

Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
[Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 89)]
0x00000000 in ?? ()

I blame the threads handling, which I'm only about half through
debugging.

> > Nope.  It's based mostly on the same 4.17 patch from David Miller, and
> > some bits from Ralf, all marked as assigned to the FSF (though I'm not
> > sure if that ever actually happened); I'll straighten out copyright
> > once I've got the whole thing done.
> 
>  You need to contact David, then.

Yep, I'm going to do that.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software                              Debian Security Team

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>