| To: | Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips |
| From: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:24:05 -0700 |
| Cc: | Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>, GDB <gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com>, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <873d9cnmad.fsf@cgsoftware.com>; from dan@cgsoftware.com on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:05:14PM -0400 |
| References: | <20010607093149.B13198@lucon.org> <3B1FCAC9.2110A024@apple.com> <873d9cnmad.fsf@cgsoftware.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:05:14PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com> writes: > > > "H . J . Lu" wrote: > >> > >> What is the better debug format for Linux/mips in the terms of gdb > >> and binutils, stabs or ecoff? I know the future is dwarf2. But I need > >> something stable now. Since Linux/x86 uses stabs, I lean toward to > >> stabs. Any comments? > > > > Go with stabs and ELF. Neither ecoff's base file format nor the debug > > info were particularly well-documented (I remember some of the bits in > > GNU being figured out by reverse engineering!), perpetuating it will > > just make your life more difficult in the long run. It will also be > > easier to move to dwarf2 when the opportunity arises. > > mdebugread is also an evil piece of code. That matches my own experiences. In case you haven't noticed, I have checked in patches to switch Linux/mips to stabs in ELF :-). H.J. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips, Daniel Berlin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New toolchain for Linux/mips, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips, Daniel Berlin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips, H . J . Lu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |