| To: | Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips |
| From: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:13:24 -0700 |
| Cc: | GDB <gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com>, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <3B1FC23D.3020900@cygnus.com>; from ac131313@cygnus.com on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:04:45PM -0400 |
| References: | <20010607093332.C13198@lucon.org> <3B1FC23D.3020900@cygnus.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:04:45PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > dwarf2 > stabs > not ecoff (er, isn't ecoff an object format like coff? I guess you mean > something like Dwarf1) Ok. I meant stabs in ecoff vs. stabs in elf. > > As Dan will probably be quick to point out, you'll get better C++ > support with dwarf2. > > There is nothing unstable about dwarf2. GDB's support for it has been > around for yonks. It is more than just gdb. For a complete dwarf2 support, we need gcc and binutils. I don't think we are there yet, at least not with stable release. H.J. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Patch: Fix gas/mips testsuite for linux/mips, H . J . Lu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips, Ian Lance Taylor |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips, H . J . Lu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips, Ian Lance Taylor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |