| To: | "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips |
| From: | Daniel Berlin <dan@www.cgsoftware.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:56:14 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | GDB <gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com>, <binutils@lucon.org>, <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010607093149.B13198@lucon.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
STABS definitely. On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, H . J . Lu wrote: > What is the better debug format for Linux/mips in the terms of gdb > and binutils, stabs or ecoff? I know the future is dwarf2. But I need > something stable now. Since Linux/x86 uses stabs, I lean toward to > stabs. Any comments? > > > H.J. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New toolchain for Linux/mips, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Patch: Switch Linux/mips to stabs, H . J . Lu |
| Previous by Thread: | stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips, H . J . Lu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips, Stan Shebs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |