-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 09:43, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Ilya Volynets wrote:
> >Now, one of the reasons for this is that maintainers of some important
> >tools (like gcc :-) are little bit too concentrated on Inhell architecture.
> >They do not apply our patches, they do not fix bugs reported by us,
> I don't know about gcc, but with binutils I haven't such problems
> so far.
That's why I didn't mention them. GCC is my primary concern now.
> Which of Your patches were rejected (and for what reason)?
I'm not talking about myself, but if you mention it to Keith, for example,
you'll hear a lot of loud sound :).
In general I think collecting stuff that floats around into one central place
will be useful.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----