| To: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Toolchain patches |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 May 2001 18:43:46 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <01053009144307.01259@gateway>; from ilya@theIlya.com on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:14:43AM -0700 |
| References: | <01053009144307.01259@gateway> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.15i |
Ilya Volynets wrote: [snip] >Now, one of the reasons for this is that maintainers of some important >tools (like gcc :-) are little bit too concentrated on Inhell architecture. >They do not apply our patches, they do not fix bugs reported by us, I don't know about gcc, but with binutils I haven't such problems so far. Which of Your patches were rejected (and for what reason)? Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Toolchain patches, Ilya Volynets |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Pthreads., Jun Sun |
| Previous by Thread: | Toolchain patches, Ilya Volynets |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Toolchain patches, Ilya Volynets |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |