| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel |
| From: | Joe deBlaquiere <jadb@redhat.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 May 2001 08:02:46 -0500 |
| Cc: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010528190412.15200Q-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686; en-US; 0.8.1) Gecko/20010422 |
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: On Mon, 28 May 2001, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:Use a global variable testable by the inline code?With both variants inlined? Now that's really ugly.Are vr41xx plain ISA I or crippled ISA II+ CPUs?Actually, they are crippled MIPS III+ 64-bit CPUsThen an ll/sc and lld/scd emulation seems to be most appropriate here. Idon't think we want to add _test_and_set() to mips64*-linux. All the cases I've seen have been for 32-bit kernels. A 64-bit PDA kernel seems like a wee tiny bit of overkill -- Joe deBlaquiere Red Hat, Inc. 307 Wynn Drive Huntsville AL, 35805 voice : (256)-704-9200 fax : (256)-837-3839 |
| Previous by Date: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Surprise! (Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Jun Sun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Mike McDonald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |