| To: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 May 2001 19:10:55 +0200 (MET DST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <00d001c0e792$d48b14e0$0deca8c0@Ulysses> |
| Organization: | Technical University of Gdansk |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: > Use a global variable testable by the inline code? With both variants inlined? Now that's really ugly. > > Are vr41xx plain ISA I or crippled ISA II+ CPUs? > > Actually, they are crippled MIPS III+ 64-bit CPUs Then an ll/sc and lld/scd emulation seems to be most appropriate here. I don't think we want to add _test_and_set() to mips64*-linux. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + |
| Previous by Date: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Kevin D. Kissell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [patch] RFC: A sys__test_and_set() implementation, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |