| To: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 May 2001 13:09:49 +0200 (MET DST) |
| Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20010525134909.A26065@nevyn.them.org> |
| Organization: | Technical University of Gdansk |
| Reply-to: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > How about the attached, then? If the p[0x100000] case is of sufficient > concern, we can work around that too, but this catches all current > uses. Fine for me. Don't worry of the gcc bug -- such large offests are rare and I doubt anyone will get hurt. Hopefully gcc will get fixed meanwhile, either by me or by someone else. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |