linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Subject: Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel
From: Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@foobazco.org>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 21:25:35 -0700
Cc: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, Joe deBlaquiere <jadb@redhat.com>, ralf@oss.sgi.com, Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com>, George Gensure <werkt@csh.rit.edu>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010523213934.16787C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:44:36PM +0200
References: <20010523205412.A10981@paradigm.rfc822.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010523213934.16787C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:44:36PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> solve a single inefficiency of ISA I code when run on better CPUs.  You
> really want to recompile code to make use of new instructions if you care
> about performance.

I agree.  Therefore I am sure some MIPS I users will be happy to build
special glibcs for their ISA.

-- 
Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@foobazco.org> http://foobazco.org/~wesolows
------(( Project Foobazco Coordinator and Network Administrator ))------
        "Nothing motivates a man more than to see his boss put
         in an honest day's work." -- The fortune file

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>