| To: | nick@snowman.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: wrt irc |
| From: | Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@foobazco.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 May 2001 08:57:42 -0700 |
| Cc: | joshua@babbage.millersv.edu, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105231154350.10190-100000@ns>; from nick@snowman.net on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 11:55:29AM -0400 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105230943440.10519-100000@babbage.millersville.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105231154350.10190-100000@ns> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 11:55:29AM -0400, nick@snowman.net wrote: > Most of the important addresses are listed in the irix headers. With > enough hardware and knowledge you can infer how those addresses are used, > and I belive he also decompiled the o2's irix kernel. Yes, I did; it was a great way to waste a few hours. Nothing of interest came of that. IRIX seems to have many layers of indirection before you actually find the code you want. Not recommended. -- Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@foobazco.org> http://foobazco.org/~wesolows ------(( Project Foobazco Coordinator and Network Administrator ))------ "Nothing motivates a man more than to see his boss put in an honest day's work." -- The fortune file |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: wrt irc, nick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: wrt irc, nick |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: wrt irc, nick |
| Next by Thread: | Re: wrt irc, nick |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |