| To: | Joe deBlaquiere <jadb@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 May 2001 15:34:13 +0200 (MET DST) |
| Cc: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, ralf@oss.sgi.com, Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com>, George Gensure <werkt@csh.rit.edu>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <3B0B5AC6.6060208@redhat.com> |
| Organization: | Technical University of Gdansk |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Joe deBlaquiere wrote: > I would vote for option #4 - make sure the ll/sc emulation stuff works > and use ll/sc in glibc instead of sysmips. Beyond the pthreads mutex Please don't. The emulation is an overkill here and the overhead is painful for ISA I systems, which are usually not the fastest ones. This has already been discussed here. If you want to go for speed and use ll/sc on an ISA II+ system, then compile glibc for ISA II or better. It will never call sysmips() then. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + |
| Previous by Date: | wrt irc, joshua |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Joe deBlaquiere |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel, Joe deBlaquiere |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |