linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?

To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?
From: Tom Appermont <tea@sonycom.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:56:28 +0200
In-reply-to: <20010510162221.A1736@bacchus.dhis.org>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:22:21PM -0300
References: <20010505144708.A12575@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20010507163210.B2381@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010508202518.A13476@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20010508214313.A12528@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010509095955.A8392@sonycom.com> <20010509104635.D12267@paradigm.rfc822.org> <3AF934AE.38AB0089@cotw.com> <20010510110847.A2799@cyberhqz.com> <20010510162221.A1736@bacchus.dhis.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
> > To get the new targets working correctly:
> >     * new binutils
> >     * new gcc built with new binutils (does the 2.95.4 branch have the
> >         changes, or only 3.0?)
> >     * new libc built with new gcc
> >     * rebuild gcc with the new libc
> > 
> > Am I missing anything?
> 
> The latter three steps are not necessary.

To avoid any further confusion, which then are the versions 
( & patches ) of binutils / gcc / libc needed to get a
linux mips toolchain we can use until the end of time? 

Tom



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>