| To: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ? |
| From: | Tom Appermont <tea@sonycom.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 May 2001 09:56:28 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20010510162221.A1736@bacchus.dhis.org>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:22:21PM -0300 |
| References: | <20010505144708.A12575@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20010507163210.B2381@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010508202518.A13476@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20010508214313.A12528@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010509095955.A8392@sonycom.com> <20010509104635.D12267@paradigm.rfc822.org> <3AF934AE.38AB0089@cotw.com> <20010510110847.A2799@cyberhqz.com> <20010510162221.A1736@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
> > To get the new targets working correctly: > > * new binutils > > * new gcc built with new binutils (does the 2.95.4 branch have the > > changes, or only 3.0?) > > * new libc built with new gcc > > * rebuild gcc with the new libc > > > > Am I missing anything? > > The latter three steps are not necessary. To avoid any further confusion, which then are the versions ( & patches ) of binutils / gcc / libc needed to get a linux mips toolchain we can use until the end of time? Tom |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Configuration of PCI Video card on a BIOS-less board, Wayne Gowcher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Keith M Wesolowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Keith M Wesolowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |